Football’s Loan system leads clubs to the wilderness

In recent years, lower league clubs have increasingly become breeding grounds, where young Premier League players are sent out on loan in order to further their professional development.

On the face of things, this may seem a convenient situation for all parties concerned.

The Premier League clubs benefit from having players of greater maturity after their stints on loan, who might have progressed enough to challenge for the first-team.

The players gain valuable game time and are in a better position of pushing for a starting berth upon returning to their parent clubs. They may have been playing 90 minutes regularly for their youth teams, but that is no substitute for rubbing shoulders with experienced professionals in a more competitive league.

Meanwhile for the lower league clubs, the loan system has become an integral part of surviving in this tough financial climate, as they are able to reinforce their squads without having to pay a transfer fee nor having to contribute to the loanees’ wages.

A resounding success, you might think?

Unfortunately, from a supporter’s perspective, there are many serious drawbacks.

Loans are often as short as three months or even a ludicrous one-month period.

As a lifelong Yeovil Town fan, I have barely been able to keep track of the constant incomings and outgoings in recent years, to the extent that I have begun to lose some of the interest and enthusiasm I once demonstrated in following the side’s fortunes.

This goes for many supporters of the Glovers, where attendances have seen a steady drop from 6,667 in 2005-06 (Yeovil’s debut season in League One) to the current season total of 3,831.

For many, the days of visiting the club shop to buy shirts complete with players’ names emblazoned on the back are a thing of the past. After all, the shirt could be outdated within weeks or even days, if the parent club of the player in question were to enact their powers to recall him whenever it wants.

Indeed, at this rate, no ten-year-old fan will ever be able to repeat the feat of Gordon Ottershaw’s son in Michael Palin’s classic ‘Ripping Yarns – Golden Gordon,’ who learnt by heart the names of all eleven players of his father’s favourite (but comically inept) team long before his birth.

Indeed, one can imagine even a most loyal supporter such as Gordon, who has struggled through six years without witnessing a single victory, losing the will to follow a side, with which he would no longer be able to identify.

The logic is quite simple. True supporters generally devote themselves to their clubs for long periods, if not for the rest of their lives, and are therefore inclined to show, at times, immeasurable levels of appreciation and respect to players who reciprocate their loyalty by remaining at the club for many years.

This is not to say that all short-term loanees are incapable of endearing themselves to supporters.

Yeovil fans still look back with great affection on Leon Best’s three months at Huish Park between November 2006 and February 2007. Despite having to return to Southampton for the final part of the season, his ten goals in fifteen matches in Somerset were crucial to maintaining our promotion push in a season which culminated in a Play-off final defeat to Blackpool at Wembley.

Tottenham’s quartet of Steven Caulker, Andros Townsend, Jonathan Obika and Ryan Mason are also remembered for the positive impact they made while on loan with the Glovers.

The problems arise when a club becomes dependent on loan players, who are subject to recall from their parent clubs at the drop of a hat. Much rests on the strength and breadth of a manager’s contacts in order to keep the cycle going of replacing one loanee with the next.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Even if a manager is able to bring in the new man promptly, it can rarely be guaranteed that he will add much, if any, extra quality to the original squad. Needless to say, there have been a number of youngsters loaned in, often from large Premier League clubs, who have simply failed to make the grade.

Several players can claim to have used loan spells as springboards to bigger and better things, very noticeably Steven Caulker, who has started in defence for Tottenham this season and scored on his England senior team debut against Sweden in November.

But for every beneficiary there will be a loser. One need only look at Caulker’s Spurs team-mate, Obika, who doesn’t look like ever making the first-team, having returned to White Hart Lane after eight separate loan stints of varying success in just three years.

The loan system, as we know it today, has depersonalized clubs, while a large share of their supporters, and indeed players, has been cast into somewhat of a football wilderness.

[cat_link cat=”premiership” type=”grid”]

Newcastle fans are loving their goal difference in Premier League survival battle

Newcastle United’s bid to avoid an instant return to the Championship was massively boosted over the weekend thanks to their 3-0 win against Southampton and with other results going for them, and Magpies fans are loving one statistic in particular.

The Toon’s comprehensive win against fellow strugglers Saints and Crystal Palace, West Bromwich Albion, Stoke City and West Ham United all losing, and Huddersfield and Swansea City drawing with each other, saw them jump up to 13th in the standings and five points clear of the relegation zone.

Stoke’s 2-0 defeat against Manchester City on Monday night saw their goal difference drop to minus 28 (the worst in the Premier League), while only the top eight teams in the standings have a better record than the Tyneide outfit’s minus 10 – which could be worth an extra point in the coming weeks – and the St James’ Park faithful can’t get enough of manager Rafa Benitez right now.

Newcastle supporters have been quick to have their say on goal difference via social media, and while one said “our GD could be worth an extra point come May”, another said “Rafa’s so-called negative tactics could be crucial”.

Here is just a selection of the Twitter reaction…

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[ad_pod ]

Liverpool fans react as outcast gets chance… flop leaving?

With Raheem Sterling sunning himself in Jamaica, Brendan Rodgers was always going to have to make a change up front for the Sunderland game. In truth, the 20-year-old winger is enjoying a well-deserved rest – this is the first Premier League game of the season he won’t feature in – after enduring a tough few weeks of leading the Reds’ line, which has coincided with some better attacking displays.

Italian ‘ace’ Mario Balotelli was expected to step into the XI, or possibly Rickie Lambert, but Rodgers has opted for Borini… interesting! The Italian spent last season on loan with the Black Cats, so his knowledge of the North East side may be key, plus his movement is a little better than his compatriot.

So how did Liverpool fans take the news? And does this mean the end of Balotelli?

[ad_pod id=’ricco’ align=’center’]

When will English football regain its perspective?

As Rio Ferdinand left the field of play following Manchester United’s tumultuous 3-2 victory over Manchester City earlier this month, the bloodied state of the defender’s left eyebrow was a fairly unsubtle precursor to the week of headlines that were set to come.

Within the aftermath of Robin van Persie’s 90th minute winner, Ferdinand was of course struck by a coin thrown from an as of yet unidentified idiot from the Etihad support. For the ex-Leeds United man, it was an unsavoury incident, but one he chose not to dwell on. Rather than fuelling the baying media’s incessant desire to panic, Ferdinand chose to play down the incident, jokingly referring to the culprit as a ‘good shot’.

Predictably however, this was never going to be enough to prevent the monsoon of moral panic that we’ve since been subjected to.

On the back of almost every Monday paper – and the front in some cases – editors chose to immortalize a frenetic Manchester derby with the image of a stricken Ferdinand, rather than that of a celebrating Van Persie. A decision based on appropriate news values? Maybe so, but the ensuing debate offered us something of a hallmark in terms of how far media hysteria has ballooned in the last ten years.

Because contrary to what the reaction to the Ferdinand incident might suggest, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen someone targeted with a missile by one of English football’s moronic minority.

Indeed, it will be 11 years next month since Liverpool lost 1-0 away to Arsenal in a stormy FA Cup fourth-round tie. It was hardly a game that will be fondly remembered in the annals of history, but given the events of the past couple of weeks, it seems strange that many seem to have forgot what happened that day.

There was only around 20 minutes left to play in the game, before a young, fresh faced and decidedly unhappy Jamie Carragher was struck by a coin amongst a couple of other missiles from the Highbury crowd. As opposed to seeing out the rest of the game and delivering a Ferdinand-esque jovial retort, Carragher took matters into his own hands, picked up the coin and proceeded to launch it back into the stands.

It was a moment of madness from the man who went on to lift the Champions League under Rafa Benitez, and it was certainly a far, far more serious incident than what we witnessed in the blue half of Manchester ten days ago. In this case, it was a supporter allegedly left with an injury, as opposed to a Premier League footballer.

[post_link url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/media-overreact-and-over-emphasise-bad-qualities-of-football-fans,https://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/the-media-must-do-more-to-help-the-game,https://www.footballfancast.com/football-blogs/english-fans-and-media-are-still-jumping-the-gun” target=”_blank” type=”tower”]

Although the difference here is within the immediate aftermath. We didn’t have anyone demanding that the players reign in their celebrations and take responsibility, as Jamie Redknapp did last week. Furthermore, you certainly didn’t hear anyone calling for the introduction of netting at football grounds, as Martin Keown recently suggested in his column for the Daily Mail. As opposed to launching into a moral crusade looking for someone to vilify and someone to change, English football took a step back and viewed it for what it was.

Carragher was widely condemned, forced to apologize and sat out the three-match ban that came with his red card for violent conduct. But there was no mass vilification for either Carragher or English football fans in general. There were no more games heaped onto his initial ban, in an attempt make an example out of him.

The incident was accepted for what it was – an unsavoury moment instigated by a minority and a ridiculous reaction from a player who was dealt with appropriately. Then that was it. Naturally, there was debate and critique within the public forum, but both fans and media accepted for what it was and moved on.

Yet in those 11 years, while the English media has always bestowed a penchant for hysteria, it seems to have developed an inability to move on from an incident without finding some form of closure.

The notion that out of the thousands of people that attend football matches every week, occasionally one or two of them might in fact be bad eggs – as in any other realm of society – is rendered inconceivable. Of course, after one coin hits Ferdinand on the head, the natural reaction is to destroy grounds by placing netting behind the goals and to stop players from celebrating.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

What happened to Ferdinand shouldn’t for five minutes be swept under the carpet or sought to be underplayed in any way. It was a serious incident and it could have had some terrible ramifications should it have landed on his retina, rather than his eyebrow.

But as opposed to focusing on the frequency in which players tend to be hit from objects from the crowd, which usually tends to be once in a blue moon, the media have decided to use an undoubtedly nasty, yet generally rare incident, as a yardstick for Premier League reality.

Increased media hysteria might seem like part and parcel of modern day football, but as with any other continued, overzealous dissection of an incident, it only serves to drag the agenda into the public domain. Before the Manchester derby, coin throwing was a condemnable, yet rare practice at football grounds. Now, we apparently need netting up and our players are at risk of getting stabbed, if you listen to Redknapp and co.

English football’s never been known for its famous sense of perspective, but it needs to try and reign in the hysteria before it starts cultivating widespread and potentially damaging changes to the game. He’s made his fair share of mistakes during his career, but perhaps we could do a lot worse than following the lead of Rio Ferdinand’s take on this one. As with all things in life, perspective is key. We’d do well to bear that in mind next time we see a flashpoint in English football.

Nottingham Forest fans delighted by arrival of former Liverpool defender Jack Robinson

Nottingham Forest manager Aitor Karanka has been in desperate need for a left-back, and he finally has one.

On Saturday, the Championship outfit announced via their official website that Jack Robinson has joined the club on a free transfer.

The 24-year-old, who began his career at Liverpool, spent the last four years at Queens Park Rangers, apart from during the 2014-15 campaign where he was at Huddersfield Town on loan.

[ad_pod ]

Robinson was a promising talent at Anfield, but he was unable to hold down a regular spot in the first team.

He did, though, win the League Cup with the Reds in 2012, but he now finds himself taking on a new challenge at the City Ground.

[brid autoplay=”true” video=”259344″ player=”12034″ title=”Watch JeanClaude Billong quickfire questions”]

Robinson, who made 34 appearances for QPR last season, has penned a two-year contract.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

The deal was a no-brainer from Forests’s point of view given that Robinson was available for free.

Judging by the reaction on Twitter, the fans are delighted by the news, and some think the left-back’s arrival has boosted the club’s Premier League promotion hopes.

Tottenham fans slam Eric Dier after Juventus performance

Tottenham Hotspur crashed out of the UEFA Champions League on Wednesday night, despite holding a lead over Juventus at Wembley stadium.

With the aggregate score tied at 2-2 heading into the game, fans were overjoyed when Son Heung-min scored in the first half to give them a comfortable lead in the tie.

However, a second half defensive collapse saw the Italian giants score the two goals they needed to go through, with Spurs unable to offer anything in reply in the final 20 minutes.

Fans were left frustrated with the evening and had particular issue with Eric Dier’s performance.

[ad_pod ]

The England international failed to adequately track Gonzalo Higuain for the Italian’s first of the night, bringing to the fore supporters’ issues with his form all season.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Many feel that Victor Wanyama should be playing alongside Mousa Dembele instead and have called on Mauricio Pochettino to drop the player, who is rated at £36m by Transfermarkt.

Fans took to Twitter to share their thoughts…

Can this Liverpool signing go from Zero to Hero?

Why always Mario Balotelli? One way or another he simply cannot stop people discussing him and it usually revolves around something negative rather than positive.

Since signing for his new club Liverpool he has not quite set the Premier League on fire, despite being a big marquee signing that came with a lot of hype and the promise of being a direct Luis Suarez replacement. Yet he has been far from being anywhere near good enough to fill the gap left by the biting hero. Not that there are many players anywhere in the world that could emulate what the Uruguyan did at Anfield, but Balo is simply not fitting in to his big signing mould casted for him by the board.

He looks like a signing to appease those fans desiring a marquee player. In truth, those fans have been duped. Brendan Rodgers didn’t want him, yet the board authorised it, purely to sell shirts and insist that the club were remaining ambitious on the back of last season’s dizzy heights of second place. 

Many fans are already getting fed up of seeing the Italian in a Liverpool shirt and have realised that Mario is not exactly the quick fix required. He was a panic buy and simply cannot do enough to shine for the reds. Why? Because he has not got the right attitude towards the game.

He spends too much time skulking around the pitch, not really interested in chasing the game or creating chances as much as he is stopping the opposition players from winding him up and throwing anxious and sad looks at the cameras if he does not get his way. If Balotelli changed his attitude and put a good shift in, he’d be a far better player. He needs to improve his work ethic if he wants to have any sort of legacy like his predecessor Luis Suarez.

There was another player with a similar attitude problem but got away with it because of his sheer out and out quality and pure class. That was Eric Cantona. He could get away with being lazy from time to time as he was an incredible talent. Let him walk back, be flat footed, whine and moan. Why? Because you knew that in the blink of an eye he would do something out of this world.

You simply do not get that with Balotelli at Liverpool at the moment which is why he is already starting to look like a major flop for his new team. Although he still has it in his own hands to turn his fortunes around and become a very important player for the reds, it is highly unlikely he will be any sort of legend.

If Balotelli can sort his attitude out, focus on getting his work rate up and take attention away from his the negative sides of his game, he will go a long way to being a good player for Liverpool. However, Liverpool lost a great player, and right now Super Mario is very far away from that.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[ad_pod ]

[ad_pod id=’ricco’ align=’center’]

Compromise that could bridge the financial gap in the Premier League?

European football appears to be at constant odds with itself. The Champions League is a competition of glory and heroics, often producing the most intense fixtures and beautiful football meanwhile the European competition’s ugly sister, the Europa League, constantly fails to grab the attention of fans.

Andre Villas-Boas told reporters at the beginning of the season that he was shocked by the English attitude towards Europe’s second competition, but then again, the Europa League tends to just get in the way. It comes with financial reward, but often proves detrimental to a club’s domestic season. Fulham played 19 extra games in the 2009/2010 season when they reached the Europa Cup final, and ended up finishing 12th in the Premier League – five places and seven points lower than the previous year when they achieved qualification.

Playing on a Thursday night against a team that came third or won a cup in one of Europe’s smaller nations is hardly beneficial to the likes of Tottenham, Everton or Liverpool, and the majority of managers opt to play youngsters and reserves instead of risking injury for their star players who will be needed at the weekend. So is it really any surprise if fans sitting on their sofa decide to watch Eastenders or Corronation Street instead of the Liverpool second team – now featuring the useless Stewart Downing at Left Back – taking on the third best club in Switzerland?

UEFA are fully aware of the problem, and have recently announced they are considering merging the beautiful damsel that is the Champions League with the brutish, slightly hairy ugly sibling that is the Europa League. Will combining these two ladies like some sort of bizarre Nazi experiment actually benefit the teams involved? Or will it just create a huge biological mess with seven arms but no hands?

From a domestic perspective, the top-half teams and cup winners that constantly miss out on Champions League football would surely benefit. The extra games are more worthwhile for a start. Facing Barcelona or Real Madrid with the chance to wow the fans with an upset is a much more exciting prospect than watching a Premier League team comfortably beat a side that would struggle in the Championship if they played in England, and furthermore would surely come with much higher gate receipts.

The long-term result would hopefully make the Premier League more competitive, and would not only give lesser teams having a good season (such as West Ham or West Brom this year) a chance of playing in Europe’s top competition, providing financial benefits for the following seasons, but also equate the balance between the top four and top seven.

The Premier League’s natural hierarchy provides stability, but it could do with a shake-up. The old top four of Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea was only broken into following the rise of Manchester City as their Sheikh owners flooded the club with their exotic fortunes, bar a few cameo appearances from Tottenham and Everton.

Then again, diluting the most elite tournament in club football by doubling the number of teams involved from 32 to 64 comes with its own set of drawbacks. There are already complaints about the likes of BATE Borisov and Nordsjaelland simply making up the numbers in the group stages, and the qualifying rounds are littered with teams that most English football fans are unlikely to have heard of. Adding an extra 32 teams that have less quality than the current 32 teams would simply make this problem worse, as countries only allocated a single Champions League spot will be given two or three, filling up the qualifying stages with worse teams.

But it would also ensure that by the group stages, only the highest quality teams in Europe would still remain, making room for the likes of Tottenham who unfairly missed out on Champions League football last season, and are clearly better than many of the lesser teams that make it to the latter stages of thecompetition. Furthermore, until the smaller clubs experience the financial benefits and quality required to be a competitive force at European level, they remain unlikely to ever progress on their own, unless the Premier League’s billionaire owners relocate to Europe’s smaller countries.

The merger is an interesting proposal, but it has not been set in stone, and is not the only idea on the table. For a long time, it has been suggested that the winners of the Europa League should be given an automatic qualifying spot into next year’s Champions League, which I believe would be a good thing. The hypothetical team would have enough quality to see off at least 14 European opponents, and would have the momentum of success from the year previous. Michel Platini, on announcing the new proposals, also rejected the idea that a European Super League, working outside of the bureaucratic politico of UEFA could come into existence. Of Course Platini would talk down such claims, but a Super League would be an interesting idea.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Either way, something has got to give. The Europa league is a take-it-or-leave-it kind of tournament. No doubt any club in Europe would happily lift the trophy, but managers will always be unwilling to risk their domestic season to win a second tier competition. Even more so, I believe that especially in England, teams like Tottenham and Everton deserve their chance to play for more than one season in the Champions League, and certainly the involvement of such teams would not diminish the tournament’s quality.

Hopefully, the domestic league would also reap the benefits as the balance of power in the Premier League table shifts more evenly, leaving us with a top seven filled with teams capable of winning the league instead of the two horse race that tends to dominate the English game.

[youtube h4cCGnT1_Nk]

"The Jamie Vardy Stories that nobody hears about" – The Underdog’s academy

Meet the man who has created his own football academy for promising young footballers that are looking for a career pathway in to professional football.

Academy president, Morris Pagniello, believes that “only one percent” of young players make it down the conventional academy route meaning that a lot of promising young footballers become discouraged from pursuing their dream career.

To stop this from happening Pagniello has started up the Genova International School of Soccer (GISS).

GISS is a residential academy that provides a full program to aid player development for young footballers from ‘under developed football nations’.

The academy provides training of the highest professional standards for players that don’t have a clear pathway to becoming a footballer.

Over 82 players who have joined or passed through the GISS Residential Academy doors have signed to professional clubs in the past 6 years.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Watch the video to find out more about the academy for players who wish to come to live and breathe football as professionals do.

Instagram: Giss_worldFacebook: Genova International School of Soccer.  website. www.issgenova.it

Everton fans react as Michael Keane says he can’t wait for Burnley return

Everton defender Michael Keane says he is relishing the chance to come up against former club Burnley at Turf Moor on Saturday, and Toffees fans have been quick to react to his comments.

The centre-back joined the Merseyside outfit in a deal that could rise to £30m from the Clarets last summer, and while he made a decent enough start to his Blues career he soon suffered a downturn in form that saw him relegated to the substitutes’ bench for a number of matches in December.

However, the 25-year-old has been more heavily involved in recent weeks and his performances on the pitch appear to be gradually improving, although some of the Goodison Park faithful don’t appear to agree.

Everton supporters took to social media to have their say on the quotes from Keane, and while one said “I can’t wait for him to be sold”, another said “so it gives him an excuse for another crap performance?”

Here is just a selection of the Twitter reaction…

[ad_pod ]

Game
Register
Service
Bonus